Jul 26, 2010

 
 

By Maureen Dowd:

 

The Obama White House is too white.

It has Barack Obama, raised in the Hawaiian hood and Indonesia, and Valerie Jarrett, who spent her early years in Iran.

But unlike Bill Clinton, who never needed help fathoming Southern black culture, Obama lacks advisers who are descended from the central African-American experience, ones who understand "the slave thing," as a top black Democrat dryly puts it.

The first black president should expand beyond his campaign security blanket, the smug cordon of overprotective white guys surrounding him — a long political tradition underscored by Geraldine Ferraro in 1984 when she complained about the "smart-ass white boys" from Walter Mondale's campaign who tried to boss her around.

Otherwise, this administration will keep tripping over race rather than inspiring on race.

The West Wing white guys who pushed to ditch Shirley Sherrod before Glenn Beck could pounce not only didn't bother to Google, they weren't familiar enough with civil rights history to recognize the name Sherrod. And they didn't return the calls and e-mail of prominent blacks who tried to alert them that something was wrong.

Charles Sherrod, Shirley's husband, was a Freedom Rider who, along with the civil rights hero John Lewis, was a key member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee of the '60s.

As Lewis, the longtime Georgia congressman, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, he knew immediately that something was amiss with the distorted video clip of Sherrod talking to the N.A.A.C.P.

"I've known these two individuals — the husband for more than 50 years and the wife for at least 35, 40 — and there's not a racist hair on their heads or anyplace else on their bodies," Lewis said.

We may not have a "nation of cowards" on race, as Attorney General Eric Holder contended, but we may have a West Wing of cowards on race.

The president appears completely comfortable in his own skin, but it seems he feels that he and Michelle are such a huge change for the nation to absorb that he can be overly cautious about pushing for other societal changes for blacks and gays. At some level, he acts like the election was enough; he shouldn't have to deal with race further. But he does.

His closest advisers — some of the same ones who urged him not to make the race speech after the Rev. Jeremiah Wright issue exploded — are so terrified that Fox and the Tea Party will paint Obama as doing more for blacks that they tiptoe around and do less. "Who knew that the first black president would make it even harder on black people?" asked a top black Democratic official.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE.

2 comments:

  1. That's what we have the CBC for. I'd rather see a forward thinking White House than a backward thinking one. Regardless of how and where they were raise should never be an issue. We all don't think alike. There are some of us with a plantation state of mind and some of us with a forward thinking state of mind. The issue is that Caucasians believe that after all of the wrong many of them have committed throughout history. That people, namely those they have stolen from, murdered and oppressed will somehow seek revenge if given the opportunity. False statement, we just want to ability to live our lives just as freely and entitled as they have been doing for centuries. If the President has the courage to speak out on inhumanity(racism)to people then we'll be waiting a long time. We all know what it's like to appease people so they want think anyone's showing favoritism when the only thing is to be is just fair and honest. If we want to see a change in their behavior we have to change ours and realize the power that we actually possess.The old ways of doing business don't work and haven't worked in the past 40 years and it's time to find another way that gets results and that takes action. We have been divided and conquered for so long we don't know what unity even looks like. If we can imagine a unified, progressive and prosperous people then we'll create it, if not we'll continue with what we have now. what Maureen Dowd is doing is playing into the game of Divide and Conquer, by pitting the haves against the have not's. They attempted to do this during the election, thank goodness most of us know better than follow this form of alienation.

    ReplyDelete