Aug 16, 2013


I know I'm not the only person who heard Robin Thicke's summer smash "Blurred Lines" and immediately thought of Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up."  You can say what you want to say, but you have to admit the songs have a similiar feel to them.

I guess the family of Marvin Gaye must have heard the same thing that a lot of people were hearing because evidently they threatened to sue Thicke as well a the records contributors Pharrell and T.I.  So in order to counteract the Gaye's family claim, the trio decided to do a preemptivie strike and sue Marvin Gaye's family instead.

Here's how the Hollywood Reporter is reporting the story:

In order to shield "Blurred Lines," the hottest hit of the summer, Robin Thicke, Pharrell Williams and Clifford Harris, Jr. are going to court.

A lawsuit was filed Thursday in California federal court by the trio against Marvin Gaye's family and Bridgeport Music, which owns some of Funkadelic's compositions. At issue are complaints about similarities between "Blurred Lines" and at least two songs.

According to the suit, a copy of which was obtained by The Hollywood Reporter, "Plaintiffs, who have the utmost respect for and admiration of Marvin Gaye, Funkadelic and their musical legacies, reluctantly file this action in the face of multiple adverse claims from alleged successors in interest to those artists. Defendants continue to insist that plaintiffs' massively successful composition, 'Blurred Lines,' copies 'their' compositions."

Read the lawsuit here.

The suit claims the Gaye family is alleging that "Blurred Lines" and Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" "feel" or "sound" the same, and that the "Gaye defendants are claiming ownership of an entire genre, as opposed to a specific work."

As for Funkadelic, there's said to be claimed similarity between Thicke's hit and Funakedlic's "Sexy Ways."

"But there are no similarities between plaintiffs' composition and those the claimants allege they own, other than commonplace musical elements," states the lawsuit. "Plaintiffs created a hit and did it without copying anyone else's composition."

A New York TImes critic has noted that "Blurred Lines" is "influenced heavily" by Gaye’s “Got to Give It Up,” but the lawsuit makes the point that "being reminiscent of a 'sound' is not copyright infringement. The intent in producing 'Blurred Lines' was to evoke an era."

The Gayes and Bridgeport are said to be threatening litigation should the plaintiffs not pay a monetary settlement. Rather than wait for such a lawsuit to proceed, the plaintiffs are going to court to determine the parties' respective rights and obligations.

In seeking a judgment, Thicke, Williams and Harris Jr. are not only looking for a declaration that their song doesn't violate the defendants' rights by copying their songs, but also that the "Gayes do not have an interest in the copyright to the composition 'Got To Give It Up' sufficient to confer standing on them to pursue claims of infringement of that composition."

Personally, I think this lawsuit is going to backfire on Thicke and co. for the simple fact there is a long history in this country of white artists stealing music from black artists and the black artists never being compensated.  Robin Thicke may win his case on legal grounds, but he may also alienate one of his largest fanbases in the process.  Some people call it inspiration, I call it stealing.  What do you think?

Please listen to both songs and tell me what you think.


Marvin Gaye - Got To Give It Up


Robin Thicke - Blurred Lines

2 comments:

Post a Comment